the cost-benefit difference is a function of both the consumer (person who is switching) and the product .. even if the product inherently offers no additional perceivable benefit -- i can still argue that the consumer will switch merely to avoid boredom and "lock-in"
3 comments:
more economic fluff:
theres no "nash equilibrium" for human stuff.. the incentive to switch is always better than the price of switching
I think our concept of sin is really warped...loyalty doesn't even permit the thought of philandering.
Though I do wonder if there is any measurable incentive in a switch..esp. in relation to a move within the male of the same species!
even more economic fluff:
the cost-benefit difference is a function of both the consumer (person who is switching) and the product .. even if the product inherently offers no additional perceivable benefit -- i can still argue that the consumer will switch merely to avoid boredom and "lock-in"
Post a Comment